Fable often helps with analyzing the harder questions and saves me time on occasion arguing with (my or others') Opus findings
Willish42 on Hacker News
arguing 90% of the points
In the thread “Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2”, replying to this comment
Helped: Verifying complicated answers and designs in complex interconnected systems.
Got in the way: Preempting others' LLM code review findings which are often false.
… even the ones that end up being wrong), usually at Opus 5.5, to preempt others' slop, and then end up arguing 90% of the points to confirm it wasn't accurate based on our usage of the system. This is all horribly inefficient, and many aspects of our codebases across the monorepo have proliferated into spaghetti code by LLM-accelerated developers, but Fable often helps with analyzing the harder questions and saves me time on occasion arguing with (my or others') Opus findings, which are often still inaccurate for a sufficiently large interconnected system. edit: I honestly don't know what percentile of "complexity" our typical usage is where I work, but I suspect it's a bit higher than the average. …