No
The only things worse than the CVE getting dropped in our laps with little warning was having Claude run into its safeguards which slowed my progress in actually protecting our customers
joshstrange on Hacker News
In the thread “Using Claude to reduce the attack surface of code”
Helped: Switching to GLM allowed mitigation when others balked.
Got in the way: Safeguards blocked investigation, POC testing, and unit tests.
… Once I was further along I was able to switch back to Claude to implement the fix but it refused to look at any POC's or test them against my dev servers, so freaking annoying. The only things worse than the CVE getting dropped in our laps with little warning was having Claude run into its safeguards which slowed my progress in actually protecting our customers. Last week Claude (and Codex) also refused to help write unit tests around existing code because it touched on authentication. …