Yes
Incredibly token efficient, fast, and gets the same quality as if you worked the whole thing with Fable/Opus/GPT
richkuo on Hacker News
In the thread “CursorBench 3.1”
Helped: Using Opus/GPT for planning and review, Composer for building and fixing.
Got in the way: Composer 2.5 struggles with higher complexity tasks on its own.
… My takeaway from Composer 2.5 is that its better to use Opus or GPT for planning, and then Composer to build, use Opus/GPT to pr review, and have Composer fix findings, and loop that process. Incredibly token efficient, fast, and gets the same quality as if you worked the whole thing with Fable/Opus/GPT.