It's ridicilously effective, but I do wonder how it would work with someone who couldn't challenge to analytic agent on domain knowledge it gets wrong
Quothling on Hacker News
In the thread “A recent experience with ChatGPT 5.5 Pro”, replying to this comment
Helped: Multi-agent fact-checking pipeline and image generation for presentations.
Got in the way: Conceptual errors in data architecture science that require expert review.
… After this, and if I'm convinced something is correct I'll hand the entire thing off to a sonnet agent, which is setup to go through the source material and give me a compiled list of exactly what I'll need to verify. It's ridicilously effective, but I do wonder how it would work with someone who couldn't challenge to analytic agent on domain knowledge it gets wrong. Because despite knowing our architecture and needs, it'll often make conceptional errors in the "science" (I'm not sure what the English word for this is) of data architecture. …