it's a bit of a mixed bag, I find it focuses on trivia but it's still useful as a first pass before letting your teammates have to catch that same trivia
eterm on Hacker News
In the thread “Get an AI code review in 10 seconds”, replying to this comment
Helped: Catching spelling mistakes and trivial issues as a first pass.
Got in the way: Overly fussy about null checks and missing core problem essence.
… In general I find claude code reviews are: - Overly fussy about null checking everything - Completely miss on whether the PR has properly distilled the problem down to its essence - Are good at catching spelling mistakes - Like to pretend they know if something is well architectured, but doesn't So it's a bit of a mixed bag, I find it focuses on trivia but it's still useful as a first pass before letting your teammates have to catch that same trivia. It will absolutely assume too much from naming, so it's kind of a good spot if it's making wrong kind of assumptions about how parts work, to think how to name things more clearly. …