No
I still find Amp too expensive to be able to use for anything useful
embedding-shape on Hacker News
Codex 60% of the times, Claude 20% and Qwen/Gemini the remaining 20%
In the thread “Amp, Inc. – Amp is spinning out of Sourcegraph”, replying to this comment
Helped: Comparing outputs from multiple models to select the best result.
Got in the way: Amp was too expensive to integrate into the workflow.
… I'm also paying for Gemini, Claude and other types of software to do my job, not even just coding. But even if I do, I still find Amp too expensive to be able to use for anything useful. I run every single coding prompt through Codex, Claude Code, Qwen and Gemini, compare which one gives me the best and go ahead with using that one. …