Mixed
often they do point to valid flaws I would've not thought about
epolanski on Hacker News
In the thread “GPT-5 vs. Sonnet: Complex Agentic Coding”, replying to this comment
Helped: Identified valid flaws in code reviews that I would have missed.
Got in the way: Missed end-to-end business context and general program fit.
… Then I review it myself and try to decide what's valuable in there and what not. And to my disappointment (towards myself): - often they do point to valid flaws I would've not thought about - miss the "end-to-end" or general view of how the code fits in a program/process/business. What do I mean: sometimes the real feedback would be that we don't need it at all. …