No
The core of the issue is that the plan produced will more often than not use humans as verifiers(correctness, optimality and quality control)
throwaway_2898 on Hacker News
In the thread “GPT-5”, replying to this comment
Got in the way: Plans required human verification and contained bugs.
TBH Claude Code max pro's performance on coding has been abhorrent(bad at best). The core of the issue is that the plan produced will more often than not use humans as verifiers(correctness, optimality and quality control). This is a fundamentally bad way to build systems that need to figure out if their plan will work correctly, because an AI system needs to test many plans quickly in a principled manner(it should be optimal and cost efficient). …