Yes
But it's faster than using google/DDG, especially with some prompting so that it just spits back code and not 5th-grade level explanatory paragraphs before and after
pc86 on Hacker News
99% correct
In the thread “MiniGPT-4”, replying to this comment
Helped: Prompting for code-only output and manual refactoring.
Got in the way: Policy requiring manual changes to avoid data leakage.
… I'd say one out of every 8-9 times I get something objectively wrong - a method that doesn't exist, something not compiling, etc. But it's faster than using google/DDG, especially with some prompting so that it just spits back code and not 5th-grade level explanatory paragraphs before and after. And well over half the time it does exactly what I need or sufficiently close that my initial refactoring step gets me the rest of the way.